Policy Strategies in Handling Rohingya Refugees in Indonesia to Support Sustainable Justice

  • Athina Kartika Sari Faculty of Law, Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Zulfikar Zulfikar Faculty of Law, Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Much Nurachmad Faculty of Law, Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Kharraz Muazarah Faculty of Law, Universitas Esa Unggul Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: refugees, fulfillment of rights, sustainable development

Abstract

Indonesia’s status as a transit country has the potential to pose negative threats in terms of law enforcement, financial security, social security, the conduct of foreign policy, and other related issues. Although Indonesia has affirmed its commitment to refugee protection as stipulated in Article 27 paragraph (2) of Law Number 37 of 1999 on Foreign Relations, which is further elaborated in Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 on the Handling of Refugees from Abroad, a number of challenges remain unresolved to this day. Against this backdrop, this research employs a normative juridical method. The formulation of the research problems is as follows: (1) What is the legal status of Rohingya refugees under international law and national law? (2) What legal strategies can be adopted in Indonesia to address refugee issues in support of sustainable justice? The conclusions of this research are as follows: (1) The arrival of Rohingya refugees on 14 November 2023 in Banda Aceh demonstrates the absence of legal recognition, as the procedures applied did not comply with either international law or national law, specifically the 1951 Refugee Convention, the 1967 Protocol, and Law No. 9 of 1992 on Immigration. Although immigration violations occurred, humanitarian considerations and the principle of non-refoulement remain central, as both migrants and refugees are in a vulnerable position. (2) Strategic measures that Indonesia may adopt in addressing refugee issues include: a) Strengthening collaboration with local communities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs); b) Promoting economic empowerment through the imposition of taxes on income-generating refugees; c) Utilizing third-party donor country funding schemes to facilitate the relocation of refugees to destination countries or to states that are parties to the Refugee Convention.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul, L. M., Paseki, D. J., & Sinaga, T. B. (2024). Prespektif Hukum HAM Terhadap Pengungsi Akibat Konflik Menurut Konvensi Wina 1951 Tentang Pengungsi. Fakultas Hukum UNSRAT Lex Privatum, 13(5), 4.
Aceh, D. S. I. (2024). Rohingya, antara kewajiban kemanusiaan dan hukum. https://dsi.acehprov.go.id/berita/kategori/mimbar-baiturrahman/rohingya-antara-kewajiban-kemanusiaan-dan-hukum
Adriansyah, A. (2023). Mengapa Warga Lokal Menolak Pengungsi Rohingya di Pulau Weh. VOA Indonesia.
Azaria, D. P. (2022). Penguatan Kelembagaan Penanganan Pengungsi Agenda 2030 Sustainable Developments Goals. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, 4(1), 55–65. https://journal.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/esensihukum/article/view/122
Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional. (2023). Eskalasi Persoalan dan Pencarian Solusi Terbaik untuk Pengungsi Rohingya di Indonesia.
Bintarawati, F., Lubis, A. F., Iqsandri, R., & Utama, A. S. (2023). Tantangan dan Prospek Perlindungan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia bagi Pengungsi Rohingya di Indonesia dari Perspektif Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(12), 1174–1175. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i12.871
Christyanti, B. L. (2016). Komitmen tanpa ratifikasi: Peran Indonesia terhadap pengungsi dari luar negeri. Jurnal Hukum Internasional, 125, 107.
Grossman, A., & Post, L. (2019). Missing persons: Refugee left out and left behind in the sustainable development goals.
Hartati, A. Y. (2013). Konflik etnis Myanmar (Studi eksistensi etnis Rohingya ditengah tekanan pemerintah). Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang.
Independen, A. J. (2023). Media jangan mengamplifikasi narasi kebencian saat memberitakan pengungsi etnis Rohingya. https://aji.or.id/informasi/media-jangan-mengamplifikasi-narasi-kebencian-saat-memberitakan-pengungsi-etnis-rohingya
Initiative, H. (2024). Citi Foundation pilih Human Initiative di Indonesia untuk Global Innovation Challenge 2024 guna tangani isu tunawisma dan pengungsi. https://human-initiative.org/citi-foundation-pilih-human-initiative-di-indonesia-untuk-global-innovation-challenge-2024-guna-tangani-isu-tunawisma-dan-pengungsi
Mamis, S., Rustan, A. S., Arnus, S. H., & Basri, H. (2024). Framing Media Dan Dinamika Opini Publik TerkaitPengungsi Rohingya Di Indonesia: Perspektif UNHCR Dan Otoritas Aceh Dalam Sorotan Kritis. Wardah, 24(2), 142. https://doi.org/10.19109/wardah.v24i2.21384
Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Kencana Prenada Media.
Primadasa, C. P., Kurnia, M. P., & Erawaty, R. (2021). Problematika Penanganan Pengungsi di Indonesia Dari Perspektif Hukum Pengungsi Internasional. Risalah Hukum, 17(1), 47–50. https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v17i1.380
Sakharina, I. K., & Kadarudin. (2016). Hukum Pengungsi Internasional.
Shalihah, F., & Nur, M. (2021). Penanganan Pengungsi Di Indonesia. In UAD Press. https://doi.org/10.34005/veritas.v2i1.236
Statistik, B. P. (2014). Kajian indikator sustainable development goals (SDGs). Badan Pusat Statistik.
Taylor, E., Yanni, E., Guterbock, M., Pezzi, C., Rothney, E., Harton, E., Montour, J., Elias, C., & Burke, H. (2014). Physical and Mental Health Status of Iraqi Refugees Resettled in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-013-9893-6.Physical
Published
2025-11-20
How to Cite
Sari, A. K., Zulfikar, Z., Nurachmad, M., & Muazarah, K. (2025). Policy Strategies in Handling Rohingya Refugees in Indonesia to Support Sustainable Justice. Awang Long Law Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v8i1.1799