FROM REMEDIAL CLAUSES TO PREVENTIVE CONTRACTUAL GOVERNANCE: RECONSTRUCTING DEFAULT CLAUSES IN INDONESIAN COOPERATION AGREEMENTS

abdurrivai; Widya Mardatillah; Firman Anugrah; Rafky Qushai Alqadri

doi:10.56301/awl.v9i1.2391

abdurrivai Faculty of Law, Bosowa University, Makassar
Widya Mardatillah Faculty of Law, Bosowa University, Makassar, Indonesia
Firman Anugrah Faculty of Law, Bosowa University, Makassar
Rafky Qushai Alqadri Law Study Programme, Faculty of Law, Bosowa University, Makassar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v9i1.2391

Keywords: Contract Drafting; Contractual Default; Legal Protection; Proportionality; Preventive Contractual Governance;

Abstract

Contractual default clauses are commonly treated as remedial provisions that become operative only after a breach has occurred. Yet generic drafting that fails to define performance standards, notice requirements, opportunities to cure, and proportionate consequences may itself generate interpretive uncertainty and intensify contractual disputes. This study examines the legal position of contractual default clauses as instruments for protecting the parties to cooperation agreements and develops a design framework capable of operating preventively. It employs normative-prescriptive (doctrinal) legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials comprise relevant provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code governing default, damages, termination, contractual validity, binding force, and good faith; secondary materials consist of contract-law doctrine and legal scholarship on default, force majeure, legal protection, contract drafting, and dispute resolution. The materials are analysed through normative inventory, systematic interpretation, comparison of doctrinal and case-based arguments, and prescriptive synthesis. The findings indicate that default clauses perform preventive, protective, and legal-certainty functions, but that these functions depend on the integration of objectively verifiable performance standards with structured responses to non-performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaysia, A. N., & Muttaqin, L. (2023). Analisis penerapan asas itikad baik dan pertanggungjawaban para pihak terkait wanprestasi dalam perjanjian kerja sama pemborongan rumah. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(3), 478–486. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.4.3.8194.478-486
Arninda, G. D., & Dilaga, H. Z. A. (2022). Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama dan Penunjukkan Pekerjaan Rumah Tahan Gempa:(Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Mataram Nomor 194/Pdt. G/2020/PN Mtr). Private Law, 2(1), 81–89.
Cahyasabrina, G. T., & Winanti, A. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Pinjam Nama Penggunaan Paylater Jika Terjadi Wanprestasi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 6(2), 673–688. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i2.7282
Fauzansyah, T., Yahya, A., & Jauhari, I. (2019). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen pembelian rumah melalui perjanjian pengikatan jual beli. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i2.619
Haris, O. K., Sanib, S. S., Zahrowati, Jabalnur, Ruliah, & Yusdianto. (2024). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Terhadap Perjanjian Kerja Sama Jual Beli Akibat Force Majeure COVID-19. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 6(3), 648–663.
Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Hukum perjanjian asas proporsionalitas dalam kontrak komersial. Kencana.
Hernoko, A. Y. (2016). Asas Proporsionalitas sebagai landasan pertukaran hak dan kewajiban para pihak dalam kontrak komersial. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.5.3.2016.447-466
Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata/Burgerlijk Wetboek), Particularly Articles 1238, 1243, 1266, 1267, 1320, 1337, and 1338.
Kurniawan, B., & Mufidi, F. (2022). Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Investasi di Bidang Pertambangan dan Akibat Hukum bagi Para Pihak Ditinjau dari Buku III KUHPerdata Dihubungkan dengan UU Penanaman Modal. Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies, 2. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsls.v2i2.2578
Lim, K., Budiartha, I., & Puspasutari Ujianti, N. (2020). Akibat Hukum Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Waralaba (Franchise) Pempek Farina di Kota Denpasar. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 1, 60–65. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.1.1.2187.60-65
Milendra, J. (2021). Analisa Klausula Force Majeure pada Perjanjian Pemborongan Pekerjaan dalam Situasi Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus Perjanjian Pemborongan Pekerjaan antara PT. Sinergi Mega Karya dengan PT. Nasari Indonesia pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Renovasi Kensington Offi. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v17i1.4615
Safitri, E., & Taupiqqurrahman, T. (2024). Analisis Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Akibat Wanprestasi dalam Kontrak Pengadaan Sarana Penunjang NICU dan Bedah Saraf. Jurnal USM Law Review, 7(1 SE-Articles), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8120
Silalahi, U., & Tanjung, B. (2021). Perjanjian Perdamaian pada Proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Berulang: Kedudukan dan Implikasi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4, 371–401. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.2.371-401
Sopamena, R. (2021). Kekuatan Hukum MoU Dari Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Batulis Civil Law Review, 2, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47268/ballrev.v2i1.451
Susanto, W., Sandika, H., & Hutagalung, A. (2021). Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial Pada Jasa Konstruksi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 8, 193–201. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v8i2.5675
Uyun, A. Q., Busyro, A., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2019). Klausula Baku Perjanjian Kemitraan antara PT. Mustika Jaya Lestari dengan Peternak Ayam Jatinegara Tegal. Notarius, 13(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i1.29161
Yuniarti, R. (2017). Efisiensi pemilihan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dalam penyelesaian sengketa waralaba. FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.793
Zamani, M. W., Suhartana, L. W. P., & Mulada, D. A. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kerja Sama Tambang Galian C (Studi Kasus Di Desa Pemepek). Commerce Law, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/commercelaw.v2i1.1343